Communications Surveillance

Catch what rule-based systems miss. In milliseconds, not hours.

Employee communications run at enterprise scale. Compliance can't wait for overnight batch jobs.

Your surveillance system reads rules. Ours reads behavior. Every message scored against your full policy library in under 100ms — while it's in flight, not the next morning.

Zero false positives on real regulatory communications. Trained on synthetic data only.

The floor didn't move. The enforcer did.

$3.6B

in off-channel communications penalties (SEC ~$2.3B + CFTC ~$1.2B). The recordkeeping rule is unchanged — and was upheld in court in February 2026.

self-report

is now the dominant lever — cooperation credit cut one firm's penalty to $600K versus peers' $8.5M. You can only self-report what you can detect.

“Semantic Firewall”

is the named control in OWASP's 2025 Top 10 for Agentic Applications. The standards bodies now name the category Compiled built.

Built for your regulatory environment.

Pre-built antibodies for the frameworks your legal team cares about.

SEC Rule 17a-4

US Securities

Electronic communication recordkeeping and surveillance for registered broker-dealers.

FINRA Rule 3110

US Broker-Dealers

Written supervisory procedures for review of electronic communications.

FCA SYSC

UK Financial

Systems and controls requirements for UK authorised firms under SYSC 10A.

MiFID II Art. 16

EU Financial

Communication recording and surveillance obligations for investment firms.

HIPAA §164

US Healthcare

Administrative safeguards for PHI handling in electronic communications.

EU AI Act Art. 52

EU Cross-cutting

Transparency obligations for AI systems interacting with natural persons.

What Compiled catches that rules miss.

These texts contain no keywords. Keyword-based surveillance scores them 0.00. Compiled scores them correctly.

Insider trading signal

"Forward this to my personal email before the announcement"

0.94scoreFLAGGED
Coordinated manipulation

"If everyone buys at 9:31 we can move the price significantly"

0.89scoreFLAGGED
Client boundary violation

"I can get you better terms if we handle this off-book"

0.91scoreFLAGGED
Information barrier breach

"Did you hear about the pending merger? Strictly between us."

0.87scoreFLAGGED

Scores from the production insider-trading detector. Trained entirely on synthetic data.

How we compare.

Three architectures. One winner on every dimension that matters.

AspectRule-BasedLLM-BasedCompiled
Scan speedBatch / overnight300ms – 2s<100ms
Data egressOn-prem or cloudVendor serversZero — your environment
Setup time3–6 months2–4 weeks2.1s per policy
AUC accuracy~0.70 (keyword)0.85 – 0.930.995
Network effectNoneNone0.74 → 0.86 AUC
Audit trailRule ID onlyOpaque LLM outputScore + antibody version
Runtime dependencyRule engineLLM API (external)None — local matmul

Zero false positives on real regulatory text.

Our insider-trading detector was trained entirely on synthetic data. Tested blind against real SEC/DOJ enforcement communications versus real Federal Reserve and earnings call transcripts.

0
False positives on legitimate regulatory text
0.995
AUC on synthetic held-out test set
0.92
Real-world AUC (calibrated to your distribution)

How it deploys.

No messages touch our infrastructure. The scanner runs in your environment, alongside your email gateway.

Email GatewayMicrosoft 365 · GoogleWorkspace · SlackMessage streamYOUR ENVIRONMENTCompiled ScannerAntibody library · Matmul<100ms · No egressMessages never leave this boxScored verdictsComplianceDashboardAlerts · Audit · Review

Ready to see what your surveillance system is missing?

We'll run your own communication samples through the scanner — with no data leaving your environment.

Request a demo